MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:51 AM in Off Topic | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
There's nothing I can add to this.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:30 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I'm guessing you are already following Harvey Organ's free-as-in-beer web site if you've stumbled across my puny site. The saturday post is usually particularly valuable. Here's an excerpt that caught my eye from yesterday's post:
When Harvey Organ says "This is the most bullish scenario I have ever witnessed in gold", I pay attention.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 12:23 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
My recent analysis of the price of gold has been based on looking for situations earlier in the current gold bull market that parallel the current situation. This analysis has indicated that we are at or near an intermediate bottom presuming the bull market is intact. I think the analysis has some value and is on track. Leave me a comment if you think I'm off-base. I particularly enjoy creative, personal insults [NOT].
This piece provides a link to the previous post along with the updated key chart and accompanying text (in "quoted italics") with a BOLD PRINT UNDERLINE summary of whether the historical parallels remain on track. I'll be starting with the most recent analysis and working backwards.
Here's the updates from the above post (now a week old).
"Now we look at gold comparing the 30-year treasury recovery from the 2008 panic lows to the current recovery from 2011 panic lows. Here's some observations:
THIS PARALLEL REMAINS ON TRACK, THE SUMMARY OUTLOOK IS UNDERLINED ABOVE.GOING OFF-TOPIC, I CONSIDER MITT ROMNEY GETTING ELECTED TO BE AN EXAMPLE OF "KEEP IN POWER THE POWERS THAT BE".
"The chart above shows each case in the current gold bull market where the weekly RSI touched 50 from above.In just about all cases (except 2008), such a touch was close to a short-term bottom in both weeks and percentage of price.
Green lines show cases that are similar to the current situation where a few months earlier gold significantly penetrated the 50 RSI, bounced back above 50 significantly (to around 60 but without touching 70) and again touched the RSI 50 from above. In four out of those five occurrances (Mar 05 being the exception), gold was with a couple weeks of a low price that has not been revisited since. This is just another reasonably independent anlysis of the current bull market showing that, if the gold bull market is in-tact, the price of gold is probably very near a bottom and about to significantly turn up. In the exceptional case of Mar 2005, the low that was never revisited was a couple of months in the future and only a couple of percent below the touch RSI 50 from above price."
SEEMS ON-TRACK WITH ANOTHER COUPLE WEEKS OF GOLD PRICE WEAKNESS TO GO. EXAMINING THE CHART MORE CAREFULLY I HAVE IDENTIFIED ANOTHER GREEN LINE (9/2006). A RESTATMENT OF THE OUTLOOK IS NOW: IN FIVE OF SIX CASES GOLD WAS WITHIN A MONTH OF A LOW PRICE THAT HAS NOT BEEN REVISITED SINCE. IN SIX OF SIX CASES GOLD WAS WITHIN 4% OF A LOW PRICE THAT HAS NOT BEEN REVISITED SINCE. THIS PUTS MY SHORT TERM GOLD OUTLOOK HAVING A LOW THAT IS NO LOWER THAN THE DEC 2011 LOW.
"What was happenning to Gold and what followed after a significant overbought spike in the S&P500 to commodities ratio (say RSI > 77)? There were four such situations, in each case:
Another independent analysis indicating the end of the gold correction is probably near (or here) provided the Gold bull market remains intact."
THE ABOVE REVISED CHART HAS THE GREEN LINES LINED UP WITH THE PEAK RSI VALUE (EQUIVALENT TO A WEEK AGO). I THINK THIS LEAVES US VERY CLOSE TO THE NEVER TO BE REVISITED INTERMEDIATE LOW WEEKLY CLOSE PRICE OF GOLD.
"We see an overbought advance ending last summer and a wave pattern of consolidation since then. Here's the wave structure:
THIS WAVE STRUCTURE REMAINS INTACT ALTHOUGH WAVE 6 HAS CONTINUED DOWN THRU THE 55-DAY MOVING AVERAGE BUT WITHOUT FORMING A LOWER LOW OR NEARING THE LOWER BOLLINGER BAND.
"The move starting in Jun 2009 follows the pattern perfectly and even matches the current situation in terms of the month of the year of wave 6 (but is compressed in time overall compared to the current situation). The result having the head and shoulders perfectly meet its target in two months time. If this worked out for the current situation we'd see $1925 in mid-may 2012."
THE CURRENT SITUATION NOW EVEN MORE CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE 2009 PATTERN. THE UNDERLINED ITALICS TARGET REMAINS ON-TRACK.
"The 2006 price action matches well with the current pattern. In addition to the wave pattern matching well, the extremity of the preceding up move (wave 1) in 2006 matches the up move during the summer of 2011. If 2012 is like 2006 we would see one more little downmove in wave 6 prior to forming the final bottom. I think this a real possibility for the next two weeks (with a target of $1650 or even $1630). The resulting action after the bottom was in was a quick 2month rise to about the size of the right shoulder above the neckline and then 8 months (without a lower low than the right shoulder of the head-and-shoulders target. If 2012 follows this pattern we should see $1875 by mid-may and $1925 near the end of the year."
WE GOT THE ANTICIPATED ONE MORE LITTLE DOWNMOVE (SEE UNDERLINED ITALICS ABOVE) AND NOW THE PATTERN EVEN MORE CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE 2006 PATTERN. THE SECOND UNDERLINED ITALICS ABOVE TARGET OF $1875 BY MID-MAY REMAINS ON TRACK.
"Last week's little correction is hardly noticeable when you consider the big picture. I know of nothing that comes close to gold as far as being in a safe, consistent primary up-trend. I think I'll stick with gold and gold-investment vehicles as my primary investment theme at least as long as that 75 week average holds."
THE ADDITIONAL TWO WEEKS OF MINOR WEAKNESS DOES NOTHING TO CHANGE THE ABOVE BIG PICTURE. I REITERATE MY ABOVE ITALICS UNDERLINED ASSESSMENT: I know of nothing that comes close to gold as far as being in a safe, consistent primary up-trend.
THIS ANALYSIS REMAINS ON TRACK WITH AN AVERAGE 6-MONTH (END OF AUGUST 2012) TARGET GOLD PRICE OF $1896/oz.
EVEN THIS SHORT-TERM CALL WORKED OUT REASONABLY WELL WITH THE FIVE-DAY MOVE BEING -.4% WHICH MATCHED EXACTLY THE AVERAGE FOR SIMILAR EVENTS. THE EXPECTED FOLLOW-ON LOW WAS NOT REACHED SO NO TRADE ENTRY WAS TRIGGERED.
What think ye? I'm happy to be leveraged up a bit with gold mining stocks and dec 2012 $1500 gold futures call options with a core holding of physical metals in vaults. Of course, anything can happen including a downward plunge that does not rhyme at all with the gold price action of the last 10 years. This is not investing advice and I don't recommend that you trade like I trade.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 10:50 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Ok, PBS (and others I presume) have had their Frontline and Nova documentaries covering the Fukushima nuclear meltdown anniversary. How's the price of Uranium handled it?
I think it has served up a nice spike down in mass psychology nuclear power revulsion selling. That's a fall from roughly $6.10 to $5.60 or roughly 9%. I'm going in long with a smallish trade with an exit of either 6% up or 6% down just to test the mass psychology expecting that the price will creep back up now tht the revulsion selling is over.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda been short on the assumption that the anniversary would trigger this kind of revulsion. If I were smart enough I could have seen it coming.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 10:20 AM in Resource Investing | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Here's my view of the interesting charts this week. I would say the work on gold has the most merit (see bold underlined text and the charts above that text). Comments follow each charts.
S&P 500 has broken out above resistance, next resistance is another 6% higher at the all time highs. That will be a third attempt on those highs and third attempts usually make it thru. If you are smarter than me, just hold on tight. Its too late for those who missed the bus to get on-board.
Banking stocks (a leading indicator) are doing even better than the general market and are overbought relative to the general market. What to do should this ratio change is significant, but for further study. Try the XLF:SPY ratio for a longer history.
Semiconductors (another leading indicator) and transportation stocks have not confirmed the S&P breakout above post-crash highs. Is this an inflation / paper rally?
30-year treasuries are now back in the normal range (crisis over) between the ema lower envelope and the ema 100.
Woulda, coulda, shoulda followed my own trading system and been long the S&P 500 since early October.
Now we look at gold comparing the 30-year treasury recovery from the 2008 panic lows to the current recovery from 2011 panic lows. Here's some observations:
The US dollar struggling with serious resistance around 81 while the previous two times it sliced thru that resistance. This coupled with Rickard's Currency War analysis (where he claims the US will intentionally debase the dollar to help unemployment) indicates that the scenario in the previous $TYX and $GOLD chart may work out as the USD dollar is intentionally kept weak.
The chart above shows each case in the current gold bull market where the weekly RSI touched 50 from above.In just about all cases (except 2008), such a touch was close to a short-term bottom in both weeks and percentage of price.
Green lines show cases that are similar to the current situation where a few months earlier gold significantly penetrated the 50 RSI, bounced back above 50 significantly (to around 60 but without touching 70) and again touched the RSI 50 from above. In four out of those five occurrances (Mar 05 being the exception), gold was with a couple weeks of a low price that has not been revisited since. This is just another reasonably independent anlysis of the current bull market showing that, if the gold bull market is in-tact, the price of gold is probably very near a bottom and about to significantly turn up. In the exceptional case of Mar 2005, the low that was never revisited was a couple of months in the future and only a couple of percent below the touch RSI 50 from above price.
Well, that's what I'm seeing tonight, except for the S&P 500 to Commodities (CCI) ratio which is quite overbought in both the weekly and daily charts. Here's the chart I think is relevant to how I'm currently positioned:
What was happenning to Gold and what followed after a significant overbought spike in the S&P500 to commodities ratio (say RSI > 77)? There were four such situations, in each case:
Another independent analysis indicating the end of the gold correction is probably near (or here) provided the Gold bull market remains intact.
When I started looking at charts this evening I was feeling some real trepidation about my gold options and gold mining positions. Now, after some decent analysis, I'm thinking that my positions are good ones and am feeling confident.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:26 PM in Precious Metal Investing, Technical Analysis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
http://www.biiwii.blogspot.com/2012/03/weekly-chart-of-goro.html
I think its a fair assessment. I'm holding a tonne of Gold Resource Corp (GORO) for the long term because I think management is stockholder friendly and the rocks are significantly above average and in a politically safe place and I think there are a lot more good rocks to be found. I don't know of any comparable stock, although I admit that Rubicon (RBY, RMX.TO) has some really good rocks.
I don't mind if the stock price goes nowhere within a +/- 20% range for the next six months provided production keeps relatively on track with no big downside surprises (strikes, mine flooding, etc.).
What is your favorite gold and miner and what do you like about it? I'm short term cautious (but holding) on GORO because I think the overall stock market is overbought and I'm fearful there won't be enough oz in the upcoming NI43-101.
Here's what I think of Gary's newsletter service (and other services I'm subscribing to):
Gary Biiwii's Notes From The Rabbit Hole - a weekly commentary that uses technical analysis (with a lot of ratio charts) to create a macro view of the overall markets and individual markets. Often ends up with a summary of "I'm not sure what's going on". I think I've learned a lot (and continue to learn a lot) from Gary, but I do not closely follow his individual calls. However, if I'd paid more attention to him last year I would have had a much better year because he correctly perceived that Gold was way, way overbought last August and I didn't. So, I'm still hanging around learning.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 12:29 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Per passenger that is. That's 8 passengers at 75 mpg. Great piece by Chris Nelder on oil demand if you click thru the photo. Scariest Peak Oil piece I've read in more than a year.
By the way, I'm seeing more 50cc scooters here in the USA. I expect I'll be seeing 150 mpg in the USA pretty soon.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:23 PM in Peak Oil | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Hat top to KevinT for some inspiration for this post. Its time for a little more of my preferred form of gold technical analysis: pattern matching within the current gold bull market. I like this because:
- manage perceptions keeping attention away from gold and what it is saying about their monetary debasement-supported preservation of their elite status and theft of middle-class wealth.
- harvest some money from the weak hands and traditional momentum and technical based traders, especially momentum traders who enter on "breakouts" with fixed size "stops". The manipulators love to run those stops.
So, here's the current gold chart.
We see an overbought advance ending last summer and a wave pattern of consolidation since then. Here's the wave structure:
Finally, waves 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 form an uncompleted reverse head-and-shoulders reversal pattern.
Has this kind of thing happened before? The chart that follows provides a 10-year view of the gold bull market identifying potentially similar situations.
Going backwards in time I see a similar pattern beginning in June 2009.
The move starting in Jun 2009 follows the pattern perfectly and even matches the current situation in terms of the month of the year of wave 6 (but is compressed in time overall compared to the current situation). The result having the head and shoulders perfectly meet its target in two months time. If this worked out for the current situation we'd see $1925 in mid-may 2012.
2008 looks similar to the pattern but wave 5 (red line) did not rise enough to form a decent head and shoulder's neckline. From where we are to the equivalent of now, the 2008 action move quickly to the top of the bollinger band. For this year, that would be a quick move to $1800. After that the great 2008 financial crisis dragged gold down hard. Do you think 2012 will be similar to 2008? I don't it will because it is still too fresh on everyone's mind. Still something like 2008 could happen. The Greek default could be similar to Bear-Sterns. If I start feeling real fear in the next month or two then my estimate of probability of a 2008-like experience will also probably rise.
The 2006 price action matches well with the current pattern. In addition to the wave pattern matching well, the extremity of the preceding up move (wave 1) in 2006 matches the up move during the summer of 2011. If 2012 is like 2006 we would see one more little downmove in wave 6 prior to forming the final bottom. I think this a real possibility for the next two weeks (with a target of $1650 or even $1630). The resulting action after the bottom was in was a quick 2month rise to about the size of the right shoulder above the neckline and then 8 months (without a lower low than the right shoulder of the head-and-shoulders target. If 2012 follows this pattern we should see $1875 by mid-may and $1925 near the end of the year.
The gold price peak of 2005 follows the pattern but not perfectly (see red lines). Wave 3 rises too high (to the top bollinger) and wave 4 does not form a lower low (a head). Still the result of the turn from where we are now is a two-month run to the height of the right shoulder above the neckline and with the price going higher thereafter. That gives us a mid-may target for 2012 of around $1875.
The gold price peak at the beginning of 2004 does not follow the pattern perfectly (see red lines). The difference is that wave 5 achieves a new multi-year high and wave 6 plunges directly to the lower bollinger band. Besides warning us that these patterns don't have to be followed, I don't think there is much to learn from this example.
The last example is the price peak of January 2003. It does not perfectly follow the pattern (red lines) in that wave 2 doesn't fall far enough, wave 3 is pretty small and wave 5 rises too far (to the upper bollinger band and much higher than the wave 3 top). Still have the wave 6 fall below the 55-day moving average is complete the bottom is just about in and a quick and sustained rise begins.
The table above summarizes the results. Here's some comments:
Of course, there is no telling the future and the current analysis is based on the idea that the gold bull market is intact and that this kind of pattern matching holds water. I think the bull market is in-tact and I think the pattern matching has value.
I like where my gold investments are positioned. I used the manipulated downward price action Friday to add about 10% to my Dec $1500 gold options and I'm about as leveraged up as I expect I'll get (roughly 2 to 1 with one part gold stocks with no margin in my retirement account and one part those gold options in my trading account). My risk tolerance seems way greater than most and I'm not providing investment advice.
Still, I hope you find some value in this analysis.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 02:59 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Here's one explanation for why I'm so fixated on gold and gold investing. Look at this chart:
Rising consistently for a decade with just a minor downturn for the "global financial crisis". The 75 week EMA barely turned down during the crisis. There's nothing else like it.
Not emerging markets.
Not crude oil, even with the Peak Oil idea, although its more consistent that stocks and bonds.
Not silver, though better than anything but gold.
Commodities in general are the closest to gold as far as being in a consistent primary trend goes.
Last week's little correction is hardly noticeable when you consider the big picture. I know of nothing that comes close to gold as far as being in a safe, consistent primary up-trend. I think I'll stick with gold and gold-investment vehicles as my primary investment theme at least as long as that 75 week average holds.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:14 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Here's a pair of situations to consider:
Both situations demonstrate that the banksters cheat to win and their legal-language wrapped paper promises aren't worth anything if its really going to cost them.
Now consider the two most popular gold investment vehicles:
Both are created and operated by the banksters and wrapped in an impenetrable shroud of legal paper, the kind of legal paper that was supposedly there to protect MF customer funds from MF management theft and supposedly there to protect Greek credit-default swap holders.
Put 2 and 2 together. If its ever going to really cost the Banksters, what do you think you'll really get from GLD and COMEX Gold holdings? CONCLUSION: That kind of gold is not going to protect you from systemic problems, even relatively mild ones.
My "real gold" systemic insurance is outside of the Bankster system. I've got some goldmoney.com, some Sprott PHYS and some coins in a vault outside my home. Where do you have yours?
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:13 AM in Precious Metals | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Let's look at prior one-day gold price hits and this time look at what happens to the price of gold 3, 6 and 9 months afterwards. These should provide a guide to what will happen next for gold this time presuming, as I do, that the gold bull market is intact.
I offer a graph with the percentage change for each event:
I offer a table with the extrapolated price based on the yesterday's closing price and the percentage changes.
I offer these observations:
Finally, as a caution I offer this table showing how much further the price of gold dropped over the 9 months following the one-day hit. Do you have the mental toughness (and margin in your accounts if you are leveraged) to handle a gold price drop into the $1400s or even touching the $1300s? Half of those table entries have a 13, 14 or 15 handle and all go into the 1600s at least. To get to those 9 month out higher prices you have to withstand the lows in this table. Brace yourself (or get out now). Gold does not go straight up.
Best wishes,
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:03 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
What to do after a day like today? Well, dump the GLD historical data from Yahoo into a spreadsheet and see if there are any parallels. The chart and table that follow show all days with a 4% or larger drop.
Here's some observations:
This scatter chart has the size of the one-day-drop as the X-axis and the percentage price change from the one-day-drop close over the next five days on the Y-axis.
Here's the table summarizing each big one-day-drop event.
Here's the current gold price chart:
Here's the 2007 gold price chart. Check out the end of February and what follows. This is the event most similar to today's event:
Here's the spreadsheet in .ods format: Download 20120229gld
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 11:29 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Thhe US Dollar is right at head-and-shoulders support:
Technically, if the pattern completes we are talking about several weeks more (at least) of the "inflation on" trade. That's:
if they react to the dollar's fall the they did from the top of the head to the neckline. If that pattern holds then silver is just about the best "inflation" trade there is. I don't have much, but I expect I'll crank that up (and dump my inflation trade "jig is up" hedge: S&P 500 puts) if the dollar closes with a 77 handle.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 07:23 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Now that I can buy anything I want, there's nothing I want. Its not just Dick's.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
P.S., Hat tip to my son for rec'ing this song. Its rare, but occasionally it fits.
Posted at 11:38 AM in Off Topic | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I don't know if these are tradeable, but I found them entertaining:
Nice bit of conspiracy theory regarding the media and big pharmaceuticals: KMO and the C-Realm Podcast, 297: The Temple of Biological Mysticism. I don't think I buy the whole anti-modern medicine thinking.
Turd Ferguson interviews Gozolo Lira. The beginning is about the Europe Debt situation but things get interesting when talk of war with Iran gets going.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 05:52 PM in Best Of The Podcasts, Off Topic | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Today we find the daily RSI for the S&P 500 being overbought (above 70 and then not falling below 60) for a month. What's the likelihood for a correction and how big might that correction be? The chart below looks at all of the comparable situations since the 2008 crash.
There are three such comparable situations. The gray boxes over the comparable situations are of the same width as how far we have gotten through the current situation. What happens beyond (rightward) of the gray boxes shows what happened in the comparable situations beyond where we are now in the current situation.
The three situations are as follows:
I'm currently protecting my January gains in gold mining stocks with a S&P 500 put options position. I expect I'll hold that position and exit using one of the following criteria:
We'll see what happens.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 04:21 PM in General Market, Technical Analysis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I thought it might be of use to you to hear which subscription investing services seem of value to me and why. Please take a moment and leave me (and your fellows) a recommendation for a service you find valuable and why its valuable. I'm particularly looking for a service which does asset class allocation based macro-economic fundamentals (e.g. leading economic indicators). I'm also looking for an energy sector (Peak Oil) stock-picking service.
Here, in order of greatest interest first, are the subscription investing services I am subscribed to or have recently subscribed to:
Highly Rely Upon:
Still Follow Closely:
Still Follow:
Discontinuing When Subscription Expires:
Recently Discontinued Services:
Not So Recently Discontinued Services:
Hope you found this useful. Please take a moment and leave me a rec for something I should try.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 12:14 PM in General Investing | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
You haven't seen much posting from me lately. I haven't had much to say lately and have not been concentrating much on the investing world:
Hope you are doing well yourself,
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:20 AM in Off Topic | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
As you can see in the above chart, we've got a little correction started with the price of gold. In this posts and I'm going to look at similar corrections where a similar correction has:
I'm looking for similar cases and seeing what happens to the RSI. Does it fall below 50 or rise back above 70? I'm calling either of those outcomes the RSI destination. What happens to the price in terms of percent fall from the top to the destination. Here's my results.
Looks like its a high probability of a continued correction until at least RSI 50 which isn't that far away. I expect, I'm going to reduce my long exposure as soon as I post this and will reevaluate when the RSI hits either 50 or 70.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:36 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Elgin Mining (ELG.V) made an offer to buy out Gold Ore Resources (GOZ.TO) in an all stock transaction nominally at a premium of 66% to GOZ.TO's recent closing price. As of 9:40AM GOZ.TO is trading up 25% relative to yesterday's closing price.
Here's my take on the situation:
I've decided to sell all my GOZ.TO even though it looks on the surface like the mine reopener will work. Here's why it looks like the mine reopener will work:
However, in the light of my reasoned conclusion that Peak Oil is "real" and "significant", I just don't want to touch anything that completely depends on the price of oil staying low relative to any other thing including gold. I don't like high-cash cost gold producers that use diesel either for power generation or for open-pit mining. I'M OUT.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Next time I buy into a gold-miner value play there has got to be an exit strategy.
Posted at 11:05 AM in Peak Oil, Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I've been feeling that the "India buys Iran's oil with gold" story (e.g. click here) was quite important for understanding the world geopolitical situation and for gold investing, but I wasn't sure exactly how. Just last night the reasoning to support the feeling came to me.
Let's review the major, recent geopolitical gold-related news stories:
Gold is what a nation (regime) relies on should the Bankster Empire turn against that nation.
The first thing the Bankster Empire does when its turning the screws on a regime is to freeze its assets. After that comes the kind of things happening to Iran (funding and supplying internal opponents, preventing them from doing trade by locking them out of the banking system, assinations, bombings, etc.). Throughout, gold reserves held within that nation allow the nation to continue to function and trade with other nations.
So, to any nation that is not fully integrated into the Bankster Empire (a non-aligned nation), gold reserves aren't a nice investment, they are an integral part of National Security (survival). As we know in the USA, national security trumps all other political priorities.
Here's my quick estimate of those nations which constitute the core of the Bankster Empire (dark green) and those nations that are clearly either close allies or vassals of the Empire (light green). Dark yellow constitutes those nations which are clearly outside of the control of the Bankster Empire with light yellow nations constituting those that I deem to be mostly outside of Bankster Empire control. Countries which are white are countries that I just don't know enough about to categorize. Please leave me a comment if you think I have a country misclassified.
As a result of the pattern formed from the Libya, Venezuela, Iran, China, Russia (all non-aligned), I'm expecting that every nation in the world (beginning with the non-aligned nations, but continuing to fully aligned nations like Germany) are going to making the accumulation a significant, no-kidding physical gold bullion reserve located on their own soil as a matter of national security, a top priority.
This major geopolitical shift is an unexpected consequence of the Banker Empire's squeezing of the Iranians that has enormous long-term bullish implications for the price of gold.
It seems Saddam Hussein's decision to sell oil in something other than the US dollar (Euros) was the final straw that drove the Bankster Empire to attack Iraq. I think that the Bankster Empire is not at all amused by the Iranian Gold For Oil deal and that they will be escalating their attack on Iran. Jim Rickards and Ron Paul are right. In my view, sanctions are a prelude to war and war with Iran is already underway and that will become more apparent as time goes by. That seems bullish for oil and gold for the short and medium-term.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 02:11 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
Here's a link to my new, rather specialized, blog: (My Ubuntu Evil Empire Escape). The real purpose of this post is to give the search engines a link to the blog. This is probably not of interest to the typical World-Of-Wallstreet reader.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 05:34 PM in Off Topic | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
There are no magnet known to man comparable to those using rare-earths. A discovery of a comparable material would be a major scientific break-thru of the Nobel Prize winning variety. Heard about that lately.
Toyota must be really desparate as far as Rare-Earth supply goes that they are trying to bluff the Chinese like this. I flat out missed the first big run in Rare-Earths. Maybe its time to buy some neodymium-rich near-term producers for a Toyota-inspired takeover play.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:19 AM in Resource Investing | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
There's a quite a pile of Interventionals coming up. Here's the outlook for Gold Interventionals for the next week plus:
Well, that's my short-term trading outlook based on the Interventionals. I expect I'll hedge some of my Gold call options beginning sometime Tuesday (probably near the 4PM close) and exit on Friday at the close with a little more short-term trading as things go along.
Gold has had a good 10%ish ($150ish) run from the lows around $1525 to nearly $1570 in just a couple of weeks and a few day pullback seems like something to prepare for. Got any dry powder?
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 04:14 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I have great respect for Jim Rickards, Sr. Managing Director for Tangent Capital, and I find that his latest King World News podcasts (click here) has a lot of valuable information. But, you can't believe everything you think you hear even from someone you genuinely admire.
Allow me to be a little bit picky. Here's a quote from the interview beginning at 18:23 sec mark: "By the way, in the last eleven years gold has hit the annual high in the first half of the year, I believe, ten out of eleven times. Check that. I'm highly certain its almost every time."
Well, that sounded interesting and tradeable to me, so I decided to check it out. I dumped the daily historical data for GLD into a spreadsheet (click Download 20120115gldhighofyear) and produced the graph that follows:
The graph provides the price of gold (using GLD as a proxy) and, the high of the that year. As you can see, the high for the year (which I presume is the same as Rickard's "annual high") occurred in the first half of the year only twice out of seven times. So, it seems that Rickards (at least as I understand him), is flat out wrong on this one. I'll be happy to retract this statement in all humility if I got it wrong or misinterpreted his statement.
The lesson I take away from this is "It's worth your time to check out as much of what an expert says as you can prior to using his analysis as the basis for an investment or trade."
Actually the above graph seems very bullish to me and here's why:
Every year for the last six years the Gold's high of the year has exceeded the previous year's high. That means we should see an all time high for Gold in 2012 (1911$+) provided the trend continues. This trend probably continues back at least a decade, but the data set I'm using only goes back to 2005.
Here's another graph inspired by Rickards' getting me thinking about annual highs:
We see that in each of the previous six years we convenient have data for that Gold ended the year higher than the annual high of the preceding year. This analysis suggests, again assuming the previous trend remains intact, that my previous forecast (click here) for the 2012 price of gold closing price of "a little over $1800" was too conservative. In the graph above, the only year where the closing price of gold was even close to the prior year's high was 2008. So, if we think (as I do) that 2012 will not have a 2008 type financial crisis and the gold bull market remains intact, then the forecast closing price for 2012 should be substantially above $1900.
The graph that follows looks at the percentage gain of the high of one year relative to the high of the prior year and the percentage gain of the close of one year relative to the high of the previous year.
Using the above graph we can estimate the high of 2012 will be between 18% and 35% higher than this year's high price giving a 2012 high price target of between $2255 and $2580. Seems high, doesn't it?
Using the above graph we can estimate the closing price of 2012 will be between 4% and 20% higher than 2011's high price with the higher likelihood of the closing price being 18% or higher (4 out of 6 years). Those prices are $1987, $2293 and $2255/oz respectively.
With this post I increase my estimated closing price of gold for 2012 to $2255/oz. It will be interesting to test this estimate with the results from 2002, 2003 and 2005. I may follow up this post with another completing the analysis.
I hope you find this discussion useful.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 02:29 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
I found that finance.yahoo.com historical downloads (e.g. http://finance.yahoo.com/q/hp?s=GLD&a=00&b=1&c=2005&d=00&e=15&f=2012&g=d) came with the date formatted as YYYY-MM-DD, (e.g. 2012-01-14) and that my preferred spreadsheet program, LibreOffice Calc, couldn't parse that date format.
So, I wrote a little Ruby programming language script to do it (click Download yfcsvfix.rb to download the script). Of course, you'll need the Ruby interpreter on your PC to run the script (click here to go to the Ruby Download page).
Running the ycsvfix.rb with no command line parameters provides the documentation for the program. Here's that documentation:
yfcsvfix <inpath> <outpath>
yfcsvfix takes a finance.yahoo.com historical price csv download
and changes the format of the first field from YYYY-MM-DD to MM/DD/YYYY.
When <outpath> is not provided the file at <inpath> is overwritten.
yfcsvfix also changes the order that CSV records appear outputting them
with the oldest records first.
I'm publishing this simple program into the public domain. No guarantees are made of its correctness or absence of bugs.
Here's the source code:
puts "yfcsvfix <inpath> <outpath>"
puts " yfcsvfix takes a finance.yahoo.com historical price csv download"
puts "and changes the format of the first field from YYYY-MM-DD to MM/DD/YYYY."
puts "When <outpath> is not provided the file at <inpath> is overwritten."
puts "yfcsvfix also changes the order that CSV records appear outputting them "
puts "with the oldest records first."
if (ARGV[0])
# Read the file in ar
hdr = nil
ar = Array.new
File.open(ARGV[0], "r") do |fin|
while line = fin.gets
if (hdr)
ar << line
else
hdr = line
end
end
end
ar = ar.sort
outpath = ARGV[0]
if ARGV.length > 1
outpath = ARGV[1]
end
puts "outpath=" + outpath
File.open(outpath, "w") do |fout|
fout.puts hdr
ar.each do |line|
sp = line.split(',')
dsp = sp[0].split('-')
odsp = dsp[1] + '/' + dsp[2] + '/' + dsp[0]
oln = odsp + ',' + sp[1] + ',' + sp[2] + ',' + sp[3] + ',' + sp[4] + ',' + sp[5] + ',' + sp[6]
fout.puts oln
end
end
end
Hope someone finds this useful. Leave me a comment if you do as it will encourage me to keep sharing what I make.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 11:13 AM in Trading Tools | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
This King World News with Michael Pento (click here) is one I can recommend.
The really interesting part starts are around 7 minutes in. The really interesting idea is his proposal for a simple way to trade the current markets. He proposes:
Anybody who has been paying attention is aware that either the risk trade is ON or the risk trade is OFF, so Pento's proposal is not exactly new. The cool part about the proposal, from my perspective, is having two default portfolios set up and ready to go ahead of time. With the portfolios prepared ahead of time you can take plenty of time to get them right and then focus on getting the timing right on when to use them.
So, here's my challenge. Help me work out the following:
What goes in the inflation portfolio?
What goes in the deflation portfolio?
Are there any core positions?
Leave me a comment with your thoughts. If I get the time I'll put my own thoughts on this up in a separate post.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 04:58 PM in Best Of The Podcasts | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Here's a dressed up version of an email I just sent out to my two brothers and sister. I'm running about 40% of my 80-something mother's retirement money (the part not locked up in trusts):
"Here's a good piece by the best of the mainstream investment columnists: http://www.hussman.net/wmc/wmc120103.htm. Being mainstream, Hussman does not take into account out of the mainstream risks, including.:
The key fact in this piece is that the best you can expect from passive, 100% invested in the stock-market investing for the next decade is 4.9% returns minus management fees and taxes compounded annually. I believe Hussman is talking about real returns computed by deflating with the bogus government manipulated CPI numbers, but I'm not sure.
There are a few takeaways from this article:
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 10:02 AM in General Market | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
MontyHigh
Posted at 10:16 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
I hear many different voices in the gold community discuss the idea that the "Banksters" are manipulating the price of gold. There is an interesting difference of opinion regarding the end-game of this manipulation.
Some voices, Bill Murphy being one of them, claim that the Banksters are leveraged short the price of gold (and silver) and that eventually (e.g. when they've sold all their physical as part of the price suppression scheme) the price of gold will shoot to the moon with the Banksters in ruins.
Other voices, including Jim Sinclair, Catherine Austin Fitts, Stewart Thompson claim that the Banksters, while managing the price of gold, are firmly in control and aren't going to lose control anytime soon. Instead they manage the price to produce extra volatility to take the leveraged trader's money. Sinclair and Thompson claim that nobody is going to make more money from the gold bull market than the Banksters and Thompson in particular mocks the idea that the Banksters a net short gold and silver.
Thompson in particular is trying to buy when the Banksters buy (that would be now) and sell when the Banksters sold (that would be above $1800 this fall).
I've recently come around to the Sinclair, Fitts, Thompson view. We may see various financial institutions go bankrupt and governments lose power and/or default on debt, but I don't expect to see the mainstream powers-that-be behind the scenes (let's call them the banksters) fundamentally lose their grip or their wealth.
How about you? Do you think "THEY" are losing it soon?
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:05 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
NOTE: This piece was written during the Christmas holiday. As I publish it on Dec 29 after three hard down days, I see that the lows I was calling for January or February are happening right now.
Its that time of year and so I'll take a twirl with my own 2012 outlook focusing on where my money is: Gold. I'm writing this as I do my analysis so you'll be seeing my thinking as it takes shape. The basis for my thinking is three key ideas:
The above chart summarizes my view of the 20xx Gold Bull Market to date:
The above chart shows how I identified the four above-trend runs. The above-trend runs all culminate with a rise to more than 20% above the 150-day moving average (top red line). Its worth noting that apart from above-trend run corrections the price of gold has fallen no more than 8% below the moving average throughout the bull market (lower green line).
The charts I'm looking at today are all logarithmic scale. That means we can compare percentage price changes by comparing the height of rectangles on the chart. The chart above has for each of the prior corrections a rectangle giving the price change from top to bottom. It also has a rectangle that can be used to estimate the end of 2012 price of gold. This rectangle gives the price change from the high a little more than a year and a quarter out. That's how long it will be from the 2011 high to the end of 2012. I've made a copy of each of these rectangles and moved them to start at the 2011 high. This allows us to see what will happen if the 2011 correction follows one of the earlier corrections. For the 2006 and 2008 corrections this price is less than the previous high. The correction we're having now lasted at least that long prior achieving all-time highs in 2006 and 2008, but not in 2009.
The above chart gives a closer look at the three prior corrections and what they would mean for the current correction. The table that follows gives the numbers.
The above table suggests that the bottom may not be in for the current correction especially if the current correction is like 2008.
Let's look at the 2008 correction a little more closely. The low price of gold, prior to the Lehman brother's bankrucpy was 21% down from the high, a value very close to the 2006 drop. I would argue that the powers-that-be lost control for a few months during the 2008 crisis starting with the Lehman Brothers bankrupcy. I don't expect them to lose control in 2012, but who really knows.
Here's the previous table with the assumption that the Aug 2008 lows were the lows for 2008 (that is, without the post-Lehman brothers collapse). Now the 2008 correction looks a lot like the 2006 correction.
The 2006 and 2008-without-Lehman scenarios are the pattern for my best guess outlook for the price of gold for 2012:
Well, that's my outlook with the reasoning behind it. I wouldn't call it bearish, but its certainly not as bullish as many of the predictions I expect you are hearing. I heard one analyst call for $2500 gold in 2012. I'm not the only analyst within the gold-bug community with modest expectations for gold 2012. Even the ever-cheer-leading Eric King could not elicit a bullish-sounding outlook from Pierre Lassonde who is expecting the average price of gold for 2012 end up below the average price for 2011 (click here). I believe Martin Armstrong expects further weakness in early 2011 as well.
The next couple of months are quite strategic. In fact, I think that next Monday, January 2, is very strategic, but the reasoning behind that is for another post. The annual percentage gain from the trend line of the first graph in this post is around 23%/year. If gold can regain and hold the recent uptrend from the first chart in this graph (see above) the target price for the end of 2012 becomes $2020/oz. If it rises above the trend line by some amount (say $75) the target rises accordingly.
It hasn't regained that trend line yet so I'm sticking with my earlier prection. My best guess outlook for the price of gold for 2012:
While I don't need links to predictions without any substantial reasoning / analysis behind it, I'd be obliged if you'd leave a comment with a link to any other analysts who both provide a quantitative outlook and the reasoning behind it.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:31 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
How often do you watch a youtube multiple times? Especially an educational one? This is one I watched once and it had enough important information that I had to watch it multiple times to see if it really made sense.
Michael Maloney explains in this long tube (click here) how the fiat, fractional-reserve monetary system works. This is the system used by the USA and virtually the whole world. Maloney claims thats that credit has to continuously expand or the system collapses. Can you help me figure out if he's right?
There's four segments that need to be considered. The first two are gimmees and definitely accurate. The key idea of the third and fourth segments are what you can help me figure out.
Starting at 20:55 and continuing to 22:15 he provides an explanation of how a non-fractional-reserve gold-standard money system used to work. This is good background material, but not particularly relevant as its been a hundred years since any country used that system.
From 22:15 to 28:06 he provides an excellent introduction to how a fiat, fractional-reserve money system works. This is something that is hard to understand, hard to believe but true and quite important. Do you get it? I accept that this explanation is accurate and reasonably complete. He doesn't mention that it is the threat of force (police and military) that is the reason why this system must be accepted by the population.
From 29:59 to 32:12 he claims that because interest is required on all of the money borrowed into existence money that the total amount of debt has to increase every month or the system starts to collapse.
From 45:09 to 46:34 explains why he thinks the total amount of debt has to increase and why this is unsustainable and must end in a debt collapse. This is because there is more money owed (amount borrowed plus interest) than is created by borrowing (the amount borrowed) and as the debt comes due (debt plus interest) and is paid or rolled over the relative amount of debt to currency in existence increases. This animation is the thing I couldn't stop thinking about and brought me back to this youtube and caused me to write this post.
Ok, so that is the background to the claim and here is the claim under consideration (starting at 31:56) verbatim: "This system requires that we go deeper into debt every month than we were the previous month; we have to always borrow more currency into existence than we are extinguishing every single month or the whole things starts to collapse". That is an exact quote. Here it is abbreviated with fixed up syntax: "This system requires that we go deeper into debt every month ... or the whole things starts to collapse".
Help me here. Is that claim true? And does "the whole thing starts to collapse" imply that the whole thing must collapse or merely that ongoing intervention is required to keep it from collapsing and that continued intervention is inherent in the system.
It seems to me that:
So it seems to me that the system is not unsustainable in that it must end. It seems me that the system is economically inefficient in that economic distortions take place when the US treasury spends money (hands out money) to its pals where that money is wasted rather then invested in more productive activities that a free market select. Should we call that handing out of money to pals malinvestment or looting? In either case it sounds like stagflation to me, not a deflationary collapse and not a hyperinflationary collapse.
So, help me. Am I wrong and is the system inherently destined for deflationary or hyperinflationary collapse or is a "slow burn" (to use Catherine Austin Fitts terminology) ongoing fall in the middle-class standard of living another alternative that can be sustained for years or decades? What is it about the system's operation that I don't get that means that a collapse MUST happen?
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 05:25 PM in General Market, Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Here's something I've learned thru the school of hard knocks.
Fearful Bearish Sentiment + Absence Of New Bad News => Relief Rally.
So, when things are really scary (as they have been recently with all the Euro news), the market does not need good news to pop. Nothing need be fixed. The mere absence of scary headlines is enough for a significant market pop.
That's why we got the pop today in things like the stock market, commodities, etc. Gold is pretty heavily manipulated so it doesn't perfectly follow this rule, but I think that it too is popping because of the absence of bad news plus a really scared gold community.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 01:44 PM in Trading Wisdom | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Gold is now free to move up to the next resistance around $1670.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 08:55 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Here's what I'm seeing in the charts. I guess I'll publish it.
The 30-Year treasury bond yield, which has turned down again, seems to be signaling a bigger, scarier market event than 2008. 2008 was a single spike down with an immediate sustained recovery back into the moving average channel. The current situation has a similar spike down that is not returning and is instead signaling more danger. Here's some observations:
The US dollar looks really strong although it seems short term likely to go thru a week or two long consolidation (see other RSI 70 touches/excursions).
The VIX isn't sensing the same fear that the 30-year treasury is signaling. Its pattern seems similar to 2010 and where a return to the 40-week moving average indicated a bottom in the stock market and anticipated the Bernanke Jackson-hole speech that hinted at QE2. It also looks like Apr/May 2009 where is signaled the end of the 2008 panic.
I'm surprised, but real-estate looks short-term bullish. Is it benefiting from those low interest rates? Still it has stopped trending up from the 2009 bottom and is basically range trading.
Commodities look weak to lousy across the board. The above chart shows industrial metals threatening to break down. Going short big miners with a stop if they don't break down in two weeks might be worth looking into as a hedge that the crisis has not peaked.
If you have read this far, the following three gold charts should reward you.
Gold took a little excursion outside the 55-day bollinger bands this week. This is ordinarily a good entry point. The RSI also took a little excursion under 30 this week (also a good entry) point. Gold found stupport at the May 2011 (previous to the most recent) all time high. Also a good place for support. If this is not 2008 all over again, then Thursday was probably a good entry point.
This chart shows that 55-day bollinger band excursions are good entry points, generally (blue arrows) and that RSI 30 touches or excursions are also often good entry points. Holding until an upper bollinger-band touch or near-touch looks good on this chart after such an entry except for some of the 2008 entries.
Here's a close up of the 2008 crisis. As you can see, even in that extreme situation, returns from 55-day bollinger band excursions and returns from sub-30 RSI excursions all had short term pops with all but one having a return to (or close to the upper bollinger band. A trading system of:
Would produce very nice positive results on all of the entries in that chart. That's what I'm holding out for currently. By the way, the current situation looks most like the Nov 2008 situation as far as the MACD goes . I wonder if we'll see a few weeks of choppy consolidation like we saw then.
In retrospect, the first chart and the last three seem most significant. They seem to be saying that we are in a serious situation like 2008, but that most of the damage to gold is done. Furthermore, the VIX chart and the real-estate chart suggest that the worst is over for the rest of the markets including the US stock market.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 05:40 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Well, we are now at that point I was planning for in an earlier post (click here). We are at the point discussed in the post, two weeks before the end of the year. Here's the current gold chart:
Its been a painful week and a half with my account being leveraged long in gold options. My Feb 2012 $1700 options are pretty close to "going to zero". I bought a few more options this Thursday close to the bottom. I still have enough gold bullion to retire on a mercenary general's pay plus a bunch more other assets. Still, I'm pretty sure that if I weren't keeping my "basically a hobby" day-job that my trading would be a lot more lucrative.
So, what's the outlook from here. Let's do a little pattern matching. We are looking for years with:
around mid-December. There aren't any years in the last decode record with an oversold RSI in Dec.
Here's a quick eval of several years in terms of the above criteria (1, 2, 3);
So, the year that is closest is 2006. It went on to have a nice run into the end of the year, a really scary start of the year followed by a great run into late spring.
Finally, if the low is in for December (big if) there is some winnings to be made to the end of year all those years.
I expect I will stay leveraged until the end of the year. I expect that I will try to get unleveraged on the last day of the year, wait for what happens of the first day of the year to decide what comes next.
In general I find the work from the earlier post (click here) to be useful for trading gold thru the New Year. You might want to take another peek. Longer term (say between now and the end of 2012) I'm quite bullish on gold as I think that nothing has changed, interest rates are still negative and the desire for gold as an inflation hedge and a safe haven against systemic risk is likely to accelerate as the financial system's problems are increasingly understood.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 02:12 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Gregor McDonald is among the best on Peak Oil and its implications. He brings the data and the analysis. He is not long-winded. I'm currently wondering whether his monthly piece with Chris Martenson is is worth enough by iteself to get me to try out Martenson's subscription service.
His latest (click here) really puts last week's unemployment numbers in perspective. I'll put a chart in here, but I rec you click thru to read the piece.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:48 AM in Peak Oil | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
One idea I've heard repeatedly in the gold community is that having the gold mining stocks go down while the general stock market and gold itself are not down is an imminent warning of a "gold take down". This is alot like the idea that "THEY" always do a gold takedown when the unemployment report goes out. Another one (click here) is "They always take the price of gold down for options expiration). All three of them anecdotally seem to be true, but none seem to hold up when I actually analyse the data.
Here's how I did my analysis of the "stocks down signals gold take down" idea:
Here's the results:
The result is that for every duration and for both gold and gold stocks the price goes up (on average) for all those durations. This is particularly surprising given that the average includes that "outlier" bad results from the crash of 2008.
By the way, I don't despise those making this kind of observation. I appreciate their experience and these kinds of observations have to led me to significantl profitable short-term trade setups based directly and indirectly on those "THEY ARE MANIPULATING THE PRICE OF GOLD" thoughts. So, keep em coming and I'll just follow St Paul's advice from 1 Thess 5:21: "Examine everything carefully. Hold fast to that which is good".
Best wishes and let me know if I've got my analysis wrong or overlooked something. It won't be the first time.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 04:41 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Xenophon (Ancient Greek Ξενοφῶν, Xenophōn; c. 430 – 354 BC)
Here's an interesting bit from "The Exploits Of Xenophon" written by Xenophon himself (loosely translated for children by Geoffrey Household) regarding what happened to him around 400 BC. A Thracian Prince named Seuthes II offered Xenophon's mercenary army: "one gold piece a month to the men, two to the officers and four to the generals".
Two observations:

This second point illustrates the idea that gold is a long-term store of wealth even across a span of 2,400 years.
UPDATE: 1/4/2011, The best estimate of Xenophon's pay is four Persian Daric's per month (click here). A Persian Daric gold coin weighed 125.5 grains (click here) or 8.1 grams (click here) or .26 troy oz (click here). So my best estimate of a Greek Mercenary General's pay is 1 oz/month (not the 4 oz/month given above). This a lot less than what it would take to live a middle-class retirement on.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 07:48 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Nice short post by Stockaphobe from the Investor Village precious metals board:
Posted at 11:39 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I'm starting to think ahead to how I'm going to trade the end of the year and then the new year. My seat of the pants recollection (prior to an in-depth analysis) is that the end of the year tends to be good, but the new year can be quite treacherous.
Following this post are the charts this analysis is based on. Here's the tabular results:
The trades I find attractive are as follows:
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:33 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I've been leveraged long and wrong for about a week and a half now. The leverage is around 3 to 1 via Gold Futures options which at least have limited downside. Its been quite painful.
I've been feeling quite bamboozled not knowing what to do about it for a few days because I don't want to sell out right at the low. After pondering things here's my best gold chart:
The obvious feature on the graph is the consistenly rising price within the three year channel. The price of gold is now nearing the bottom of the channel which means longer term its probably getting very close to probably a good time to buy (and its probably not the time to close out losing positions). The price has also been supported by the 30-week simple moving average with only one isolated weekly close below that average.
The green area is the 30-year US treasury-bond yield. The yield has been down there near the 2008 crisis lows for more than a month. Unlike 2008, which was a single V shaped crisis, the yield is going down back down again indicating another surge of great fear. The price of gold bottomed early in the 2008 crisis and climbed thruout the 30-year treasury yield's V-bottom. The big rise in gold in the summer of 2009 was a fear episode like 2008's. The next leg down in the 30-year treasury yield that started in mid-oct 2011 was accompanied by a gold price rise just like 2008. I consider the last two weeks of price weakness that accompanied the falling treasury yield to be the result of Gold Cartel manipulating the December options expiration. If so, the price of gold may soon jump backup as the options expiration period has passed.
The blue arrows identify situations where the price of gold fell from the top of the channel to the bottom of the channel, bounced to the middle of the channel and then started falling again. In both of the previous two cases the price fell all the way to the bottom of the channel. In 2009 it took 6 weeks (four more beyond where we are now in 2011) to get to the bottom of the channel. In 2010 it took 4 weeks (two more beyond where we are now in 2011) to get to the bottom on the channel. Those bottoms, in both cases where multi-month bottoms
Putting this all together, my favored scenario is for gold to fall back to the bottom of the channel and put in a multi-month bottom. That target, if it hit immediately is around $1640 or another 2.5% down.
Of course, it could also immediately bounce (the Euro rumors of a "plan" are back) and either never hit the bottom of the channel or take a few weeks to get there which would relieve my current discomfort.
Falling out of the bottom would mean that the current phase of the gold bull market (as bounded by the rising channel) is over. If that kind of penetration occurs it will probably be quite dramatic as speculators watching the same trendline either dump long positions or jump into short positions.
So, I'm expecting 2.5% more leveraged pain with but with a downside of another 5% or so if the support is lost. I may turn some of my call options into synthetic put options to limit the downside risk. A call is turned into a synthetic put holding the options and then shorting a futures contract.
How low do you think the current gold correction will go?
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 02:52 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
WARNING: This may not be my greatest post and may not be worth your time.
As explained in a prior post (click here), I'm now long gold with a fairly large position because I was expecting a pre-Thanksgiving bounce (WRONG). Here's the table that was the basis for that expectation:
Instead, gold has dipped pretty hard. So, how does one manage such a trade? I'm going to reexamine mine entry criteria and then compare what has happened with previous such calendar-based trades.
Here's the charts for gold for the last 8 years where green arrows represent the calendar-based entry equivalent to this trade (at the close of the Wed one week before the Wed before Thanksgiving).
The first thing I see is that the 2007 trade looks most like this year's trade and, contrary to what was in the table, was actually a loser. Going back and looking at the numbers I see that I made a mistake constructing the table, ARGHH!.
The next thing I see is that several years had decent gold price dips like this current one: 2007, 2010, 2008, 2006. It looks to me, based on the 2007, 2010, 2008 and 2006 charts, that a four or five day pop is about due. I expect I'll manage this trade by waiting for a four or five day pop to exit.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 01:53 PM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I'm hardly an expert, but it seems to me that something significant has changed as far as the Euro crisis is concerned. In the past, the media buzz would be about the Merkel and Sarkozy team. Sarkozy and Merkel would always be meeting, talking, preparing for important meetings, having plans to come up with plans with racy, hopeful headlines coming out every few days. I just don't hear any such buzz.
I think Merkel has dug in her heals and said "No More" to German financed bail outs while everyone else, including Sarkozy, are asking for more. Is this just a negotiating standstill of some kind? Or, is everyone off trying to figure out how their country handles what comes next by themselves? I think the danger of a "Lehman" moment for the Euro crisis is now higher than it ever has been.
What do you think?
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 06:49 AM in General Market | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I like to look for historical patterns around days where the manipulation may be rampant and last night I looked at Thanksgiving. I was expecting to see a pattern of using the lightly traded Friday session to turn the price down. I didn't see much of a pattern there. I did see a nice pattern on the week leading up to Thanksgiving.
So, to be methodical, here's a dead-simple trading system:
Here's the results (one row for each of the different entry days):
Its pretty rare to see something like rows 33, 34, 35 and 36 where for each of six years in a row you get a tradeable bump up where all the trades are decent winners.
I also see that something extraordinary happened on Friday before Thanksgiving 2008 with gold rising 8% in one day. Looking back at the charts I see that was the short-term pop off a bottom during the 2008 panic. The S&P500 jumped something like 15% during those days. I've excluded 2008 from the average results because its such an out-lier.
This kind of trade looks pretty attractive to me. I have already opened a position for just this short-term trade.
By the way, the results for the S&P 500 are also attractive (but not as attractive as for Gold) either in average returns or percentage winners. Silver's results are attractive but without the consistency of gold and without a higher average return. So, gold is the place for me for this short-term trade. I have taken all my protective shorts off (copper and S&P500). I expect I'll revert to a smaller long-gold/short copper trade next week, but until them this long gold is the only short-term trade for me.
Of course, past results are no sure predictor of what will happen so everyone thinking about this has to do their own due diligence and manage their risk appropriately.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 11:00 AM in Precious Metal Investing | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

Here's a link to a newspaper article covering the Debt Ceiling supercommittee timetable. Looks like things start really getting hot around Thanksgiving. For me, the rich part is that even if they don't agree on cuts the automatic cuts don't start until Jan 2013 (after the election). I guess that's why they call them "politicians".
Here's some highlights from the article:
Nov. 23: Deadline for the committee to vote on a plan with $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction.
Dec. 2: Deadline for the committee to submit report and legislative language to the president and Congress.
Dec. 23: Deadline for both houses to vote on the committee bill.
Jan. 15, 2012: Date that the "trigger" leading to $1.2 trillion of future spending cuts goes into effect, if the committee's legislation has not been enacted.
If you are trading you may want to keep this timetable in mind.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:24 AM in General Market | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Last weekend around this time I felt completely bamboozled after looking at the charts. This week I feel like I'm seeing some things. This posts puts a few of the things I see up with comments. Click thru to see the charts in their full resolution.
First oil:
Oil is rising hard and fast. We know that when it gets too high it crashes the world economy.
The more representative $BRENT crude oil has put in a higher low and broken out of that downtrending channel.
Brent is also now rising faster than commodities in general. The world economy cannot grow in the face of a strong, sustained real rise in the price of oil, IMHO.
Gold and the US dollar are rising at the same time. That indicates real fear.
Commodities in general look bearish to me having failed to close the gap at the 2008 highs and remaining under the moving averages.
Copper looks bearish to me also.
China has bounced off a bottom but is at resistance.
The US stock market has bounced up off a double-bottom and is fighting with significant resistance at the head and shoulders neckline which is also the 61.8 fibonacci line.
My overall conclusion is that we are in a relief rally that has about run out of gas, but that this week will put it to the test. If China, the S&P500 and copper move up this week then the rally probably continuesthru the end of the year following the usual seasonals. I guess its possible for the S&P500 to continue higher for a while despite everything else falling as money seeks out a US safe haven from Europe (and Asia).
Gold seems strong against the S&P500, copper and commodities (not shown) and seems to be accelerating out of the above 3 year channel. I'm bullish because I think its different from earlier in the bull market. If it were business as usual it would take a lot longer for gold to recover from the August overbought condition.
I've been dubious about silver, but this chart shows that when silver bounces off the bottom bollinger band that it typically goes up to the top bollinger band and runs for a while (with the 20-day moving average as an exit signal). I guess I have to get me some silver, especially if the S&P 500 goes up this week.
At this point I'm long gold futures options, long gold stocks, have one silver stock, am long gold/short copper futures and short the S&P500 (as deflation insurance). Based on this look at the charts I expect I'll jettison the S&P 500 if it breaks thru the resistance and holds it and will find some way to buy a good chunk of silver if it doesn't.
Of course, everyone has to take responsibility for their own investing and this is not a recommendation.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:49 PM in Precious Metal Investing, Technical Analysis | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
My savings took a giant hit (~70%) from my top in 2007 to the bottom 2008. That was before I started using technical analysis. That can happen when you depend just on fundamental analysis and your analysis is WRONG. I don't ever want to have that happen again.
The above chart shows that there was something I could have done to profit from the big crash in 2008. Go long gold and short copper. Gold as a store of value in times of fear and uncertainty. Copper as a commodity whose price is sure to get hit hard in a major economic slow down. The chart shows that ratio making a continuous move that could more than double what you have at risk, supported the whole way by a very tight 20-day moving average.
The fundamental buzz around copper concerns the almost certainty of a significant recession in Europe (China's biggest export market) along with scary anecdotal stories out of China itself regarding a potential housing bust.
I've already long and strong (but not heavily leveraged) gold with various kinds paper and physical gold. I expect I'm going to play that 20 day moving average on the long gold short copper trade with a decent sized percentage of my networth at risk via the futures market as both a big economic/market hit insurance trade with an expectation of profit. A decent size position, but not anything that could blow me up.
Of course, I'm not recommending any such thing for anyone else, this post is merely pointing out an interesting looking chart that shows you want to look for if another major downleg in this Great Recession resumes.
MontyHigh, www.worldofwallstreet.us
Posted at 09:25 AM in General Market, Precious Metal Investing, Resource Investing | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
MontyHigh: World Of Wallstreet welcomes a new author, Nancy Smith.
How has the year 2011 been for the US economy? Was it a satisfactory one or below the average? Well, if you’ve had a nodding acquaintance with the recent financial events throughout the US, you must be unanimously acknowledging with all the other financial experts that 2011 had been a disastrous year for the nation’s economy and all the events have gradually eroded the confidence of the debtors as a large number of them had to rush to debt consolidation firms to eliminate their debt burden. Apart from the Greek and the sovereign debt crisis having an adverse impact on the economy of the US, there are some other factors too that led to a severe and shocking financial crisis within the economy. Here are some events that are worth mentioning.
Rising of the debt ceiling: When the US economy was drowning in a sea of federal debt and couldn’t repay the amount, there were constant debates of the raising of the federal debt ceiling so that the nation could start borrowing once again and stop incurring debts. However, there were too many controversies regarding the debt ceiling and in spite of all the controversies, the final decision were to raise the ceiling so that the nation could get back a firm grip on their financial state. The Republicans and Obama both took this decision so that they could revive the US economy.
Credit downgrade by the S&P: Another financial event that scared the investors and the debtors was the credit downgrade by the S&P. For the first time in the history of the US, it lost the pristine credit rating (AAA) and that was cut off by one notch to AA+. This was a drastic decision by the credit rating agency and the investors went through a tough financial time as they were at a risky position when they couldn’t calculate the exact losses that they could face with their financial assets. The experts predicted that the interest rates on the personal loans and the mortgage loans would increase and therefore the debtors would be at a loss. But despite the predictions, the mortgage rates behaved abnormally and went through record low levels.
The above 2 events holds utmost importance in 2011 as the entire world economy and its measures revolved around them. Now that the top-notch credit rating has been reduced and the debt ceiling has been raised, the new worries are of the US economy sleepwalking into yet another financial fiasco. However, how much is this true? Read on.
Can the US economy avert a stall and pick up pace?
Research reveals that the economic growth in the US picked up pace in the last quarter of 2011 and has also shown signs of recovery, though staggeringly slow. Analysts have found out that the consumers spent more on health care and utilities and the business firms have invested more on software programs and vehicles. The total output of nation’s goods grew at an annual rate of 2.5% since July and almost doubled the rate of the previous quarter. Though all the aforementioned improvements are not at all brisk but they do dispel the fears of the economy backsliding into yet another recession. Investors are again happy with their investment decisions and a broad agreement has been stuck with Europe to curb the debt crisis.
Posted at 07:03 AM in Additional Authors | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments